In Illinois
$10 Billion Gone.
That money was funding
145
local governments
123
nonprofits
47
school districts
630
other recipients
How funding disruptions are hurting Illinois
Last updated September 15
All grant funding disruptions in Illinois
How Illinois has been hit hardest
Here are three significant ways the state has felt the impact of federal funding disruptions.
Food and Nutrition
SNAP funding slowed
$4B disrupted
Millions lose food stamps under Trump cuts. Arizona is hardest hit | Reuters
Health
Biomedical education grants cancelled and frozen
$967M disrupted
Northwestern and UChicago hit hard as NIH slashes research funding | Axios Chicago
Justice and Legal
Law enforcement equipment and training support selectively discontinued
$44M disrupted
Bay Area Jurisdictions Expand Legal Fight Against Trump Sanctuary Crackdown | Local News Matters
Explore the data
Take a closer look at the impact of funding disruptions, in this state or every state.
Tap for details
How Illinois is fighting back
Across the country, states are going to court to force the administration to keep its promises and restore funding.
Illinois has joined14 lawsuitsand restored$0in grant disruptions.
Learn more about the work to restore promised federal funding. How states are fighting backMethodology
All content on Lost Funds is based on publicly available data.
The primary source for grant award amounts is USAspending. Litigation information is pulled directly from court documents available via CourtListener. Expected funding figures are drawn from the strongest evidence available. We rely on award announcements when we can, falling back to agency budgets, Congressional appropriations, and historical trends. If we have only national funding levels for an impact, we estimate states’ expected shares using historical spending when possible, supplemented by program-specific allocation factors like population or highway miles.
We catalog a disruption when one of the following has occurred:
- the formal cancellation of funding a federal agency has committed to deliver under a grant award or contract for procurement;
- the freezing of funds wherein a formal cancellation does not exist, but grant and contract recipients cannot draw down funds; or
- a slowdown in the pace of grantmaking as measured by the number of new awards issued or fewer dollars obligated or outlaid under awards compared to previous years.
We identify funding disruptions using a variety of signals, including agency communications, directives from the administration, media coverage, litigation filings, and direct submissions.
We also track litigation arising from disruptions where the attorney general or governor of a state brings an action against President Trump, federal departments or agencies, or executive branch officials. In cases where plaintiff states seek nonmonetary relief such as an injunction, we calculate the amount under dispute for a given impact area as the aggregate of disrupted funds among plaintiff states. Where plaintiff states have specified loss amounts in their pleadings, we use those figures to calculate the amount of funding restored from litigation, otherwise we derive them from state-level estimates of funding disruptions.
Note: For the purposes of this site, states are defined as the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
How to cite the data:
Clawson, J., Kaczmarek, U., Ross, N., Scott, E. R., Shan, M., Mairson, E. & Delaney, S. (2026). Lost Funds: A States United and Grant Witness Project Tracking Funding Disruptions under the Trump Administration [Dataset]. Accessed {access date}. https://lostfunds.org
Share the facts
The administration’s federal funding disruptions affect Americans in every state. Spread the word and help others learn more.