Skip to main content

In West Virginia

$506 Million Gone.

That money was funding

41

local governments

18

state agencies

16

nonprofits

125

other recipients

How funding disruptions are hurting West Virginia

Last updated September 15

Click to explore impacts

How West Virginia has been hit hardest

Here are three significant ways the state has felt the impact of federal funding disruptions.

Explore the data

Take a closer look at the impact of funding disruptions, in this state or every state.

Tap for details

Disrupted funding impacts. Select a row to see full details.
Disaster Relief$334,556,089$172,142,725
  • disaster survivors
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Health$101,935,249$111,301,500
  • children
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Health$365,917,930$71,664,947
  • patients
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Transportation$30,585,808$30,585,808
  • travelers
Never meaningfully begun
Transportation$23,500,826$22,700,826
  • ev drivers
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun$35,672,783
Energy$24,440,033$20,314,602
  • low-income households
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Employment and Labor$28,826,991$15,437,597
  • job seekers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Environment$12,035,914$11,675,096
  • low-income households
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun
Food and Nutrition$1,021,536,615$10,505,337
  • low-income households
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Education$5,920,608$5,581,159
  • students
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Health$5,474,982$5,284,982
  • underrepresented communities
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Environment$4,001,152$4,001,152
  • urban communities
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Health$5,644,135$3,983,387
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Agriculture$4,344,498$3,963,686
  • farmers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Disaster Relief$3,432,787$3,382,748
  • public safety
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Food and Nutrition$3,341,849$3,341,849
  • farmers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Justice and Legal$11,433,210$3,005,011
  • crime victims
  • +3
Funding slowdown
Education$2,479,808$1,754,013
  • underrepresented students
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Justice and Legal$746,974$887,881
  • crime victims
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Economic Development$1,127,654$827,654
  • small businesses
  • +3
Funding slowdown
Culture$1,699,681$819,549
  • local communities
  • +3
Funding slowdown
Agriculture$1,569,951$583,351
  • underrepresented farmers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Social Services$2,542,395$570,395
  • teenagers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Energy$2,531,937$435,030
  • rural communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Science and Technology$428,474$230,368
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Agriculture$55,741$190,856
  • veterans
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Justice and Legal$1,871,134$136,357
  • local communities
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program
Housing$296,956$119,956
  • renters
  • +3
Funding slowdown
Education$205,534$116,104
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown
29 impacts$2,002,484,915 total expected$505,543,926 total lost$35,672,783 total restored

How West Virginia is fighting back

Across the country, states are going to court to force the administration to keep its promises and restore funding.

Methodology

All content on Lost Funds is based on publicly available data.

The primary source for grant award amounts is USAspending. Litigation information is pulled directly from court documents available via CourtListener. Expected funding figures are drawn from the strongest evidence available. We rely on award announcements when we can, falling back to agency budgets, Congressional appropriations, and historical trends. If we have only national funding levels for an impact, we estimate states’ expected shares using historical spending when possible, supplemented by program-specific allocation factors like population or highway miles.

We catalog a disruption when one of the following has occurred:

  1. the formal cancellation of funding a federal agency has committed to deliver under a grant award or contract for procurement;
  2. the freezing of funds wherein a formal cancellation does not exist, but grant and contract recipients cannot draw down funds; or
  3. a slowdown in the pace of grantmaking as measured by the number of new awards issued or fewer dollars obligated or outlaid under awards compared to previous years.

We identify funding disruptions using a variety of signals, including agency communications, directives from the administration, media coverage, litigation filings, and direct submissions.

We also track litigation arising from disruptions where the attorney general or governor of a state brings an action against President Trump, federal departments or agencies, or executive branch officials. In cases where plaintiff states seek nonmonetary relief such as an injunction, we calculate the amount under dispute for a given impact area as the aggregate of disrupted funds among plaintiff states. Where plaintiff states have specified loss amounts in their pleadings, we use those figures to calculate the amount of funding restored from litigation, otherwise we derive them from state-level estimates of funding disruptions.

Note: For the purposes of this site, states are defined as the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

How to cite the data:
Clawson, J., Kaczmarek, U., Ross, N., Scott, E. R., Shan, M., Mairson, E. & Delaney, S. (2026). Lost Funds: A States United and Grant Witness Project Tracking Funding Disruptions under the Trump Administration [Dataset]. Accessed {access date}. https://lostfunds.org

Download full dataset

Share the facts

The administration’s federal funding disruptions affect Americans in every state. Spread the word and help others learn more.