Skip to main content

In South Dakota

At Least $512M Gone.

That money was funding

24

tribal entities

16

nonprofits

11

state agencies

105

other recipients

How funding disruptions are hurting South Dakota

Last updated October 30

Click to explore impacts

How South Dakota has been hit hardest

Here are three significant ways South Dakota has felt the impact of federal funding disruptions.

Energy

Rural energy modernization funding slowed

$15M disrupted

USDA Keeps Freeze on REAP Grants | DTN

Education

Teacher training programs terminated

$10M disrupted

Trump slashed teacher training, citing DEI. Educators say the grants fought staff shortages | Associated Press

Energy

School building modernization programs gutted

$4M disrupted

Report Department of Energy Delays Funding for Energy Efficiency Work in Public Schools | SMART Union

Explore the data

Take a closer look at the impact of funding disruptions, in this state or every state.

Download South Dakota data Download full dataset

Tap for details

Disrupted funding impacts. Select a row to see full details.
Health$74,321,983$134,820,135
  • children
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$279,350,465$110,289,595
  • patients
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Disaster Relief$156,639,277$99,013,676
  • disaster survivors
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Environment$47,812,156$47,497,644
  • local communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Transportation$25,124,677$24,824,677
  • ev drivers
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun——
Environment$19,949,725$17,247,125
  • underserved communities
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Energy$17,286,203$15,007,740
  • rural communities
Funding slowdown—
Energy$14,312,534$10,974,403
  • low-income households
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Education$13,412,200$9,678,618
  • students
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Commerce$8,844,375$8,844,375
  • tribal communities
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Energy$7,951,513$7,951,513
  • electricity customers
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Energy$4,358,473$4,358,473
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Commerce$3,893,916$3,853,480
  • rural communities
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun—
Food and Nutrition$2,735,595$2,735,595
  • farmers
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Disaster Relief$2,735,407$2,735,407
  • wildfire communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Environment$2,599,589$2,599,589
  • urban communities
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Food and Nutrition$339,197,102$2,441,266
  • low-income households
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Disaster Relief$2,201,110$2,246,069
  • general public
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Employment and Labor$12,706,183$1,466,495
  • job seekers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Agriculture$1,624,150$1,407,944
  • underrepresented farmers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$3,319,528$760,338
  • underrepresented communities
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Education$1,863,009$615,971
  • students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Justice and Legal$394,892$394,923
  • crime victims
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Health$1,211,589$355,144
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Education$999,963$245,188
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Health$2,009,102$210,873
  • mothers
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program——
Education$911,646$76,578
  • graduate students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Employment and Labor$24,450$58,133
  • workers
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Health$120,454$16,494
  • patients
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
29 impacts$1,047,911,266 total expected$512,727,461 total lost

How South Dakota is fighting back

Across the country, states are going to court to force the administration to keep its promises and restore funding.

27 states have joined lawsuits against the administration. South Dakota is not yet one of them.

Learn more about the work to restore promised federal funding. How states are fighting back

Methodology

All content on Lost Funds is based on publicly available data.

The primary source for grant award amounts is USAspending. Litigation information is pulled directly from court documents available via CourtListener. Expected funding figures are drawn from the strongest evidence available. We rely on award announcements when we can, falling back to agency budgets, Congressional appropriations, and historical trends. If we have only national funding levels for an impact, we estimate each jurisdiction’s expected share using historical spending when possible, supplemented by program-specific allocation factors like population or highway miles.

We catalog a disruption when one of the following has occurred:

  1. the formal cancellation of funding a federal agency has committed to deliver under a grant award or contract for procurement;
  2. the freezing of funds wherein a formal cancellation does not exist, but grant and contract recipients cannot draw down funds; or
  3. a slowdown in the pace of grantmaking as measured by the number of new awards issued or fewer dollars obligated or outlaid under awards compared to previous years.

We identify funding disruptions using a variety of signals, including agency communications, directives from the administration, media coverage, litigation filings, and direct submissions.

Note: For the purposes of this site, states are defined as the 50 states and the District of Columbia. We also track funding disruptions in the U.S. territories (Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands) and in the freely associated states (the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau), which receive federal funding under Compacts of Free Association with the United States.

How to cite the data:
Clawson, J., Kaczmarek, U., Ross, N., Scott, E. R., Shan, M., Mairson, E. & Delaney, S. (2026). Lost Funds: A States United and Grant Witness Project Tracking Funding Disruptions under the Trump Administration [Dataset]. Accessed {access date}. https://lostfunds.org

Download full dataset

Share the facts

The administration’s federal funding disruptions affect Americans in every state. Spread the word and help others learn more.