Skip to main content

In Ohio

At Least $4.93B Gone.

That money was funding

98

local governments

80

nonprofits

26

colleges and universities

394

other recipients

How funding disruptions are hurting Ohio

Last updated October 30

Click to explore impacts

How Ohio has been hit hardest

Here are three significant ways Ohio has felt the impact of federal funding disruptions.

Transportation

Support for community mobility programs eliminated

$603M disrupted

Social Services

Housing programs for migrant children selectively ended

$124M disrupted

Energy

Industrial decarbonization awards selectively ended

$102M disrupted

Trump admin cuts $3.7B for industrial decarbonization and carbon capture | Canary Media

Explore the data

Take a closer look at the impact of funding disruptions, in this state or every state.

Download Ohio data Download full dataset

Tap for details

Disrupted funding impacts. Select a row to see full details.
Food and Nutrition$7,696,474,879$1,762,242,297
  • low-income households
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Health$551,070,229$670,300,920
  • children
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program—
Transportation$606,329,285$602,711,183
  • pedestrians
  • +4
Funding slowdown——
Health$1,582,472,311$537,188,779
  • patients
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$555,857,199$526,172,957
  • local communities
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Social Services$157,155,276$123,648,745
  • unaccompanied migrant children
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program——
Energy$101,675,901$101,694,570
  • workers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Disaster Relief$552,813,387$60,261,315
  • disaster survivors
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Environment$54,867,639$56,252,439
  • k-12 students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Disaster Relief$28,656,864$55,441,049
  • general public
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$58,668,763$55,109,197
  • low-income households
  • +3
Never meaningfully begun—
Transportation$31,933,577$31,933,577
  • travelers
Never meaningfully begun—
Environment$29,112,586$29,112,586
  • urban communities
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Agriculture$32,065,574$28,978,899
  • farmers
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Employment and Labor$206,371,432$28,713,472
  • job seekers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Commerce$49,556,078$23,562,098
  • rural communities
  • +3
Never meaningfully begun—
Environment$20,810,277$19,084,697
  • underserved communities
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$42,916,436$17,891,691
  • patients
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Transportation$90,127,911$17,012,023
  • ev drivers
  • +3
Never meaningfully begun—
Disaster Relief$17,095,323$15,510,279
  • rural communities
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Transportation$25,610,629$15,239,556
  • consumers
  • +3
Funding slowdown——
Health$28,215,607$15,202,245
  • underrepresented communities
  • +4
Funding slowdown—
Energy$14,652,055$13,792,075
  • local communities
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Food and Nutrition$13,254,230$13,254,230
  • farmers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Energy$13,082,320$13,082,320
  • electricity customers
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Education$16,897,900$12,356,552
  • students
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$16,887,033$12,259,708
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Education$11,774,656$11,054,823
  • underrepresented students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Education$6,175,846$7,015,511
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Housing$6,682,210$6,682,210
  • migrants
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Education$13,273,730$6,521,383
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Energy$6,731,886$6,117,614
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown——
Social Services$4,828,994$4,828,994
  • teenagers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Health$5,884,263$4,663,880
  • mothers
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program——
Housing$10,644,494$4,491,681
  • renters
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Justice and Legal$3,887,280$3,933,453
  • crime victims
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Education$6,870,113$3,831,717
  • graduate students
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Agriculture$3,849,487$3,432,792
  • underrepresented farmers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Education$3,245,625$3,254,101
  • educators, students
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Transportation$3,759,742$1,850,139
  • travelers
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Science and Technology$3,390,767$1,759,936
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$3,564,046$1,637,791
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program—
Environment$2,319,621$1,409,226
  • general public
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program—
Commerce$1,187,394$1,187,394
  • underrepresented businesses owners
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program—
Economic Development$4,153,901$1,153,901
  • small businesses
  • +3
Funding slowdown—
Education$3,388,716$674,615
  • students
Cut-off mid-program—
Social Services$1,205,544$459,744
  • survivors of domestic violence
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Natural Resources$327,671$240,406
  • boaters
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
Energy$10,524,696$154,673
  • rural communities
Funding slowdown—
Disaster Relief$118,845$118,845
  • wildfire communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown—
Employment and Labor$269,751$3,113
  • workers
  • +2
Funding slowdown—
51 impacts$12,712,689,979 total expected$4,934,487,401 total lost

How Ohio is fighting back

Across the country, states are going to court to force the administration to keep its promises and restore funding.

27 states have joined lawsuits against the administration. Ohio is not yet one of them.

Learn more about the work to restore promised federal funding. How states are fighting back

Methodology

All content on Lost Funds is based on publicly available data.

The primary source for grant award amounts is USAspending. Litigation information is pulled directly from court documents available via CourtListener. Expected funding figures are drawn from the strongest evidence available. We rely on award announcements when we can, falling back to agency budgets, Congressional appropriations, and historical trends. If we have only national funding levels for an impact, we estimate each jurisdiction’s expected share using historical spending when possible, supplemented by program-specific allocation factors like population or highway miles.

We catalog a disruption when one of the following has occurred:

  1. the formal cancellation of funding a federal agency has committed to deliver under a grant award or contract for procurement;
  2. the freezing of funds wherein a formal cancellation does not exist, but grant and contract recipients cannot draw down funds; or
  3. a slowdown in the pace of grantmaking as measured by the number of new awards issued or fewer dollars obligated or outlaid under awards compared to previous years.

We identify funding disruptions using a variety of signals, including agency communications, directives from the administration, media coverage, litigation filings, and direct submissions.

Note: For the purposes of this site, states are defined as the 50 states and the District of Columbia. We also track funding disruptions in the U.S. territories (Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands) and in the freely associated states (the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau), which receive federal funding under Compacts of Free Association with the United States.

How to cite the data:
Clawson, J., Kaczmarek, U., Ross, N., Scott, E. R., Shan, M., Mairson, E. & Delaney, S. (2026). Lost Funds: A States United and Grant Witness Project Tracking Funding Disruptions under the Trump Administration [Dataset]. Accessed {access date}. https://lostfunds.org

Download full dataset

Share the facts

The administration’s federal funding disruptions affect Americans in every state. Spread the word and help others learn more.