Skip to main content

In North Dakota

$612 Million Gone.

That money was funding

14

local governments

14

state agencies

11

tribal entities

92

other recipients

How funding disruptions are hurting North Dakota

Last updated September 15

Click to explore impacts

How North Dakota has been hit hardest

Here are three significant ways the state has felt the impact of federal funding disruptions.

Explore the data

Take a closer look at the impact of funding disruptions, in this state or every state.

Tap for details

Disrupted funding impacts. Select a row to see full details.
Health$121,041,900$179,178,001
  • children
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program
Disaster Relief$177,010,709$115,643,806
  • disaster survivors
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Health$256,793,043$105,176,841
  • patients
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program
Environment$42,666,243$42,078,364
  • local communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Transportation$42,026,945$41,847,625
  • ev drivers
  • +3
Never meaningfully begun$18,560,334
Transportation$31,933,577$31,933,577
  • travelers
Never meaningfully begun
Energy$18,626,317$14,262,023
  • low-income households
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Environment$10,368,851$13,663,362
  • k-12 students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Energy$17,383,494$13,390,282
  • rural communities
Funding slowdown
Disaster Relief$10,924,539$11,334,126
  • public safety
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Environment$13,794,746$10,223,507
  • low-income households
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun
Employment and Labor$13,032,415$7,851,620
  • job seekers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Environment$7,680,869$7,680,869
  • urban communities
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Education$4,546,335$4,707,448
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Commerce$3,328,310$3,328,310
  • rural communities
  • +2
Never meaningfully begun
Health$4,461,041$2,049,796
  • students
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Disaster Relief$1,760,049$1,510,787
  • wildfire communities
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Education$1,614,620$1,268,312
  • students
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Transportation$3,948,219$1,118,674
  • travelers
  • +2
Funding slowdown
Science and Technology$1,966,988$1,110,486
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Social Services$1,580,221$901,960
  • teenagers
  • +1
Cut-off mid-program
Justice and Legal$5,896,361$745,873
  • crime victims
  • +3
Funding slowdown
Health$816,654$570,080
  • mothers
  • +3
Cut-off mid-program
Education$718,164$195,699
  • graduate students
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Environment$184,280$184,280
  • underserved communities
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
Justice and Legal$820,603$181,562
  • local communities
  • +4
Cut-off mid-program
Housing$786,405$125,305
  • renters
  • +3
Funding slowdown
Agriculture$83,722$83,722
  • veterans
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Education$150,001$14,200
  • students
  • +1
Funding slowdown
Environment$24,982$1,934
  • researchers
  • +2
Cut-off mid-program
30 impacts$795,970,603 total expected$612,362,431 total lost$18,560,334 total restored

How North Dakota is fighting back

Across the country, states are going to court to force the administration to keep its promises and restore funding.

Methodology

All content on Lost Funds is based on publicly available data.

The primary source for grant award amounts is USAspending. Litigation information is pulled directly from court documents available via CourtListener. Expected funding figures are drawn from the strongest evidence available. We rely on award announcements when we can, falling back to agency budgets, Congressional appropriations, and historical trends. If we have only national funding levels for an impact, we estimate states’ expected shares using historical spending when possible, supplemented by program-specific allocation factors like population or highway miles.

We catalog a disruption when one of the following has occurred:

  1. the formal cancellation of funding a federal agency has committed to deliver under a grant award or contract for procurement;
  2. the freezing of funds wherein a formal cancellation does not exist, but grant and contract recipients cannot draw down funds; or
  3. a slowdown in the pace of grantmaking as measured by the number of new awards issued or fewer dollars obligated or outlaid under awards compared to previous years.

We identify funding disruptions using a variety of signals, including agency communications, directives from the administration, media coverage, litigation filings, and direct submissions.

We also track litigation arising from disruptions where the attorney general or governor of a state brings an action against President Trump, federal departments or agencies, or executive branch officials. In cases where plaintiff states seek nonmonetary relief such as an injunction, we calculate the amount under dispute for a given impact area as the aggregate of disrupted funds among plaintiff states. Where plaintiff states have specified loss amounts in their pleadings, we use those figures to calculate the amount of funding restored from litigation, otherwise we derive them from state-level estimates of funding disruptions.

Note: For the purposes of this site, states are defined as the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

How to cite the data:
Clawson, J., Kaczmarek, U., Ross, N., Scott, E. R., Shan, M., Mairson, E. & Delaney, S. (2026). Lost Funds: A States United and Grant Witness Project Tracking Funding Disruptions under the Trump Administration [Dataset]. Accessed {access date}. https://lostfunds.org

Download full dataset

Share the facts

The administration’s federal funding disruptions affect Americans in every state. Spread the word and help others learn more.